Journal of Dental Implants
   About JDI | Search | Ahead of print | Current Issue | Archives | Instructions | SubscribeLogin 
Users Online: 747  Wide layoutNarrow layoutFull screen layout Home Print this page  Email this page Small font size Default font size Increase font size


 
 
Table of Contents
PRACTITIONER SECTION
Year : 2015  |  Volume : 5  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 60-61

Two step impression technique for implant restorations


1 Division of Clinical Dentistry, School of Dentistry, International Medical University, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
2 Department of Prosthodontics, Government Dental College and Hospital, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India

Date of Web Publication2-Apr-2015

Correspondence Address:
Pravinkumar G Patil
School of Dentistry, International Medical University, Jalan Jalil Perkasa 19, Bukit Jalil, Kuala Lumpur, 57000
Malaysia
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0974-6781.154442

Rights and Permissions
   Abstract 

Two-step (spacer used with the putty impression first and then the wash stage) impression technique is commonly used for making impressions in conventional fixed dental prosthesis. Impressions for implant fixed restorations are usually taken in 1-step. This article describes two-step impression technique for the implant fixed restorations. With the 2-step putty-wash impression technique described in this article, pressure developed on the impression analogues is negligible hence more accuracy and less deformation can be achieved.

Keywords: Dental implants, elastomeric impressions, impression


How to cite this article:
Patil PG, Muley B. Two step impression technique for implant restorations. J Dent Implant 2015;5:60-1

How to cite this URL:
Patil PG, Muley B. Two step impression technique for implant restorations. J Dent Implant [serial online] 2015 [cited 2019 Jun 26];5:60-1. Available from: http://www.jdionline.org/text.asp?2015/5/1/60/154442


   Introduction Top


Two-step (spacer used with the putty impression first and then the wash stage) impression technique is commonly used for making impressions in conventional fixed dental prosthesis. Nissan et al., studied the accuracy of 3 putty-wash impression techniques using the same impression material and concluded that 2-step putty-wash impression technique (with 2 mm wash spacer) is significantly more accurate than 1-step technique (putty and wash impression materials used simultaneously). [1] Impressions for implant fixed restorations are usually taken in 1-step. While two-step pick-up impression procedure for implant-retained overdentures is described by Gregory-Head and LaBarre. [2] This article describes two-step impression technique for the implant fixed restorations. For multiple implants, the impression analogues are usually splinted for stability to resist deformation caused due to pressure developed during impression making procedure. [3] Akalin et al., investigated the effect of impression technique and implant angulation on the impression accuracy and concluded that the models with implants placed parallel to each other exhibited greater accuracy than a model with implants placed at angles to each other. [4] With the 2-step putty-wash impression technique described in this article, pressure developed on the impression analogs is negligible hence more accuracy and less deformation can be achieved.


   Technique Top


  • At the prosthetic phase appointment for implant fixed restorations, make a custom impression tray using autopolymerizing or light polymerizing acrylic resin material (GC, GC United Kingdom Ltd., Newport Pagnell, UK) by keeping the open space for impression copings
  • Remove the gingival healing abutments and place impression-analogues (preferably open-tray impression analogs) on the implants intraorally. Try in the custom tray and ensure minimum 4 mm space all around the impression analogues
  • Adapt a double thickness modeling wax (Modeling wax; Deepti Dental Products, Ratnagiri, India) around the impression copings [Figure 1]. Furthermore, prepare and adapt a 2 mm thick vacuum formed polyethylene sheet spacer (Tray-Vac™ Complete, Buffalo Dental Manufacturing, NY) on remaining prepared teeth in the arch (if present) in usual manner [Figure 1]
  • Make the impression with a putty elastomeric impression material (Aquasil Putty; Dentsply Austenal, York, PA). After setting, unscrew all the impression-analogs in the usual manner and remove the impression out of the mouth. Alternately polyether impression material can be used to add the stiffness
  • Remove the impression-analogues, modeling wax and spacer (if present) from the putty impression [Figure 2]a
  • Inject the light body impression material (Aquasil-light body; Dentsply Austenal, York, PA) on and around the gingival margins of the impression-analogs and prepared teeth. Also add the light body impression material on the spacer and wax areas of the putty impression and reseat the putty impression intraorally
  • Inject light body impression material in the space between the tray and impression analogs if not filled completely. After setting, unscrew the impression-analogs and remove the impression and inspect it for the defects [Figure 2]b.
Figure 1: Impression-analogs placed and covered with modelling wax. Note the spacer on remaining prepared teeth

Click here to view
Figure 2: (a) Putty impression with analogs, wax and spacer removed. (b) Two-step putty-wash impression

Click here to view


 
   References Top

1.
Nissan J, Laufer BZ, Brosh T, Assif D. Accuracy of three polyvinyl siloxane putty-wash impression techniques. J Prosthet Dent 2000;83:161-5.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Gregory-Head B, LaBarre E. Two-step pick-up impression procedure for implant-retained overdentures. J Prosthet Dent 1999;82:615-6.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
de Avila ED, de Matos Moraes F, Castanharo SM, Del′Acqua MA, de Assis Mollo F Jr. Effect of splinting in accuracy of two implant impression techniques. J Oral Implantol 2014;40:633-9.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Akalin ZF, Ozkan YK, Ekerim A. Effects of implant angulation, impression material, and variation in arch curvature width on implant transfer model accuracy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2013;28:149-57.  Back to cited text no. 4
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2]



 

Top
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
   Introduction
   Technique
    References
    Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed4470    
    Printed50    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded350    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal