Journal of Dental Implants
   About JDI | Search | Ahead of print | Current Issue | Archives | Instructions | SubscribeLogin 
Users Online: 711  Wide layoutNarrow layoutFull screen layout Home Print this page  Email this page Small font size Default font size Increase font size


 
 
Table of Contents
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2015  |  Volume : 5  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 16-18

Cross-sectional study estimating prevalence of maxillary sinus septum in South Indian population


1 Department of Orthodontics, Nala Dental Hospital, Madurai, India
2 Department of Prosthodontics, Rajan Dental Institute, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
3 Department of Prosthodontics, Nala Dental Hospital, Madurai, India

Date of Web Publication2-Apr-2015

Correspondence Address:
Gowri Natarajarathinam
No. 56, Dr. Radhakrishnan Salai, Mylapore, Chennai - 600004, Tamil Nadu
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0974-6781.154423

Rights and Permissions
   Abstract 

Maxillary sinus septum is an anatomical variation in the maxillary sinus. Sinus septum is also an important anatomical structure that complicates sinus lift procedure.
Aim of the Study : This study evaluated the prevalence of maxillary sinus septa in the edentulous and dentate maxilla using digital orthopantomogram.
Materials and Method: This study was based on the analysis of digital orthopantomogram images for posterior maxilla that were obtained from patients who visited a Private Hospital. A retrospective analysis of 921 pairs of nonpathological maxillary sinuses was done. Patients who had pathological findings were excluded from the study.
Results: Sinus septum was present in 217 (23.6%) of the 921 pair of maxillary sinuses. Totally, 704 (76.4%) patients did not have maxillary sinus septum. Also, out of 527 male patients, 125 patients had the septum and out of 394 female patients, 92 patients had sinus septum.
Conclusion: This study gives an idea about the prevalence of sinus septum that would help a surgeon prevent a few possible complications during sinus lifting

Keywords: Dental implants, digital orthopantomogram, maxillary sinus, sinus septum


How to cite this article:
Kannaperuman J, Natarajarathinam G, Rao AV, Muthusamy N. Cross-sectional study estimating prevalence of maxillary sinus septum in South Indian population. J Dent Implant 2015;5:16-8

How to cite this URL:
Kannaperuman J, Natarajarathinam G, Rao AV, Muthusamy N. Cross-sectional study estimating prevalence of maxillary sinus septum in South Indian population. J Dent Implant [serial online] 2015 [cited 2019 Jun 26];5:16-8. Available from: http://www.jdionline.org/text.asp?2015/5/1/16/154423


   Introduction Top


Osseointegrated implants are considered one of the modality to functionally restore partial and complete edentulism. Dental implant therapy has become a proven and safe treatment modality providing both a conservative and esthetic alternative compared to conventional fixed and removable prosthesis. However, implant therapy may not be possible if available bone is deficient at the surgical site. Implant placement in the posterior maxilla is especially complicated due to pneumatization of the maxillary sinus in the edentulous region. The alveolar process of the edentulous posterior maxillary bone height is reduced. This phenomenon is exacerbated by pneumatization of the maxillary sinus. The level of vertical bone height varies by person, [1],[2],[3],[4] so vertical bone height for implant placement may become deficient in certain individuals.

Maxillary sinus septa were first described by underwood in 1910. [4] They are walls of cortical bone present within the maxillary sinus; their shape has been described as an inverted gothic arch arising from the inferior or lateral walls of the sinus, and may even divide the sinus into two or more cavities. The risk of the membrane perforation increases when anatomical variations, such as a maxillary sinus septum, are present. [5],[6]

Therefore, it is important for septa to be accurately diagnosed on preoperative imaging. The occurrence and location of maxillary sinus septa have been evaluated using panoramic radiography and computed tomography (CT). The prevalence of sinus septa varies from 16% to 58% according to the literature. [4],[7],[8] Underwood found 30 septa in 45 skulls (90 maxillary sinuses), demonstrating a 33% prevalence. Krennmair et al., [7] reported a prevalence ranging from 14% to 31.7%, depending on patient age and tooth loss. Recently, according to Kim et al., [8] sinuses with septum or septa were found in 53 of 200 sinuses, demonstrating 26.5% prevalence.

The location of sinus septa also varies according to the literature. The most common location described by underwood was the posterior region. However, Krennmair et al., [7] observed the majority of septa in the anterior/premolar region of edentulous maxillae and dentate maxillae (57.1%). According to Kim et al., [8] the majority of septa are located in the middle/molar region (50%). The remaining septa, located in the anterior/premolar region and in the posterior/distal aspect of the second molar region, represent 25.4% and 23.7%, respectively.

Even though underwood [4] published a detailed description of maxillary sinus anatomy in 1910, for decades these septa were considered clinically-insignificant anatomical variations. Now, however, we must understand the maxillary sinus and anatomical variations because the lateral hinge door formation is a complicated procedure and the membrane is susceptible to perforation during elevation in the presence of a maxillary sinus with septa. [5],[9],[10],[11],[12],[13],[14],[15] Therefore, only when the prevalence, location and morphology of the sinus septa are understood, a precise surgical plan can be made and complications from sinus surgery prevented. [16],[17]

The aim of this study is to analyze the location and prevalence of maxillary sinus septum using digital orthopantomogram images for posterior maxilla that were obtained from the patients who visited Nala Dental Hospital, Madurai, India.


   Materials and methods Top


This study was based on an analysis of digital orthopantomogram images of the posterior maxilla that were obtained from patients who visited Nala Dental Hospital, Madurai, India, during the period of June 2010 to June 2012. The images included in this study those who were not having pathological findings. The digital orthopantomogram that was made using orthopantomogram (Kodak 8000C Digital Panaromic and Cephalometric System , Carestream Dental LLC, USA).

Three examiners were trained individually, with calibration exercises to identify and locate the sinus septum in the digital images of the orthopantomogram [Figure 1]. Each orthopantomogram was analyzed by these three examiners to confirm the presence or absence of sinus septum. While analyzing maxillary sinuses of the 921 patients, it was considered that the sinus septum was present in a patient if either one of the two sinuses had a septum. Patients not having maxillary sinus septum on the both sides are considered absence of sinus septum.
Figure 1: Digital orthopantomogram showing maxillary sinus septum

Click here to view



   Results Top


Nine hundred and twenty-one patients, excluding the patients with a pathologic appearance were analyzed. Out of 921 sinuses, 217 (23.6%) sinuses had maxillary sinus septum. In which 704 (76.4%) patients does not have the maxillary sinus septum. In terms of gender out of 527 males, 125 patients had the maxillary sinus septum and out of 394 females, 92 patients had the maxillary sinus septum. In terms of sinus location, 118 septum existed in right sinuses, and 99 septa existed in left sinuses.


   Discussion Top


Several authors have studied the prevalence of maxillary sinus septum. [4],[6],[7],[8],[18],[19],[20] Underwood [4] found 30 septa in 90 sinuses, demonstrating 33% prevalence, and Ulm et al. found 15 septa in 82 sinuses, demonstrating a prevalence of 18.3%. Also, Krenmmair et al. reported 32 septa in 200 sinuses, demonstrating 16% prevalence, and Velasquez-Plata et al. [18] reported 75 septa in 312 sinuses, demonstrating a prevalence of 24%.

This study revealed 132 septa (23.6%) in 561 sinuses. The prevalence of the present study agrees with the results of the previous studies. Sinus septa can be divided into primary septa and secondary septa; the primary septa arise from the development of the maxilla, whereas the secondary septa are said to arise from the irregular pneumatization of the sinus floor following tooth loss. In other words, primary septa are congenital, and secondary septa are acquired.

The septa above the apical area of an edentulous ridge cannot be distinguished into primary or secondary septa without previous radiographic records. Therefore, it can be said that septa above teeth are primary, and septa above an edentulous ridge are primary or secondary. In terms of sinus location, from our observation, we found that 118 septum existed in right sinuses (23.6%), and 99 septa existed in left sinuses (25.4%). In spite of the limitation of not including septa size, the present study indicates that maxillary sinus septa can develop in all maxillary sinus regions whether they are atrophic/edentulous or nonatrophic/dentate.

Therefore, the presence/absence and the location of the septum need to be diagnosed using CT. Only then can a precise surgical plan be decided upon, and postoperative complications can be prevented. [21],[22] For instance, opening 2 adjacent windows instead of one could be necessary to facilitate access to and elevation of the Schneiderian membrane. In other cases, the septum can be removed using an instrument, such as a hemostat.


   Conclusion Top


In this study, the results point that whether the maxilla is atrophic or not or whether the ridge is edentulous or not, the prevalence and location of the maxillary sinus septa varied anatomically. Therefore, to prevent complications during surgery and postoperative complications, the clinician must have accurate information and a clear understanding of the patient's maxillary sinus. In the present study, only the result of the digital orthopantomogram image reading was presented, and actual clinical evidence and CT scan diagnosis is unexplored. Therefore, further study of the anatomical variation of the maxillary sinus is required.

 
   References Top

1.
Chanavaz M. Maxillary sinus: Anatomy, physiology, surgery, and bone grafting related to implantology - Eleven years of surgical experience (1979-1990). J Oral Implantol 1990;16:199-209.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Cawood JI, Howell RA. A classification of the edentulous jaws. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1988;17:232-6.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Vinter I, Krmpotic-Nemanic J, Hat J, Jalsovec D. Does the alveolar process of the maxilla always disappear after tooth loss? Laryngorhinootologie 1993;72:605-7.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Underwood AS. An inquiry into the anatomy and pathology of the maxillary sinus. J Anat Physiol 1910;44:354-69.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Boyne PJ, James RA. Grafting of the maxillary sinus floor with autogenous marrow and bone. J Oral Surg 1980;38:613-6.  Back to cited text no. 5
[PUBMED]    
6.
Farmand M. Horse-shoe sandwich osteotomy of the edentulous maxilla as a preprosthetic procedure. J Maxillofac Surg 1986;14:238-44.  Back to cited text no. 6
[PUBMED]    
7.
Sailer HF. A new method of inserting endosseous implants in totally atrophic maxillae. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 1989;17:299-305.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Beaumont C, Zafiropoulos GG, Rohmann K, Tatakis DN. Prevalence of maxillary sinus disease and abnormalities in patients scheduled for sinus lift procedures. J Periodontol 2005;76:461-7.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Kasabah S, Slezák R, Simunek A, Krug J, Lecaro MC. Evaluation of the accuracy of panoramic radiograph in the definition of maxillary sinus septa. Acta Medica (Hradec Kralove) 2002;45:173-5.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Maksoud MA. Complications after maxillary sinus augmentation: A case report. Implant Dent 2001;10:168-71.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Ueda M, Kaneda T. Maxillary sinusitis caused by dental implants: Report of two cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1992;50:285-7.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Ulm CW, Solar P, Krennmair G, Matejka M, Watzek G. Incidence and suggested surgical management of septa in sinus-lift procedures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995;10:462-5.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Tatum H Jr. Maxillary and sinus implant reconstructions. Dent Clin North Am 1986;30:207-29.  Back to cited text no. 13
[PUBMED]    
14.
Van den Bergh JP, ten Bruggenkate CM, Disch FJ, Tuinzing DB. Anatomical aspects of sinus floor elevations. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000;11:256-65.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Betts NJ, Miloro M. Modification of the sinus lift procedure for septa in the maxillary antrum. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1994;52:332-3.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Krennmair G, Ulm CW, Lugmayr H, Solar P. The incidence, location, and height of maxillary sinus septa in the edentulous and dentate maxilla. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1999;57:667-71.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Neivert H. Symposium on maxillary sinus: Surgical anatomy of the maxillary sinus. Laryngoscope 1930;40:1-4.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Tidwell JK, Blijdorp PA, Stoelinga PJ, Brouns JB, Hinderks F. Composite grafting of the maxillary sinus for placement of endosteal implants. A preliminary report of 48 patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1992;21:204-9.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Kim MJ, Jung UW, Kim CS, Kim KD, Choi SH, Kim CK, et al. Maxillary sinus septa: Prevalence, height, location, and morphology. A reformatted computed tomography scan analysis. J Periodontol 2006;77:903-8.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Velásquez-Plata D, Hovey LR, Peach CC, Alder ME. Maxillary sinus septa: A 3-dimensional computerized tomographic scan analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002;17:854-60.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Krennmair G, Ulm C, Lugmayr H. Maxillary sinus septa: Incidence, morphology and clinical implications. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 1997;25:261-5.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Lee WJ, Lee SJ, Kim HS. Analysis of location and prevalence of maxillary sinus septa. J Periodontal Implant Sci 2010;40:56-60.  Back to cited text no. 22
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1]



 

Top
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
   Introduction
    Materials and me...
   Results
   Discussion
   Conclusion
    References
    Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed4511    
    Printed73    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded507    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal